top of page

EMA Addendum: Clinical Development of Vaccines in Immunocompromised Individuals

Writer's picture: Sharan MuruganSharan Murugan

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has released an addendum to its Guideline on the "Clinical Development of Vaccines to address the specific challenges of Conducting Vaccine Clinical Trials in Immunocompromised Individuals". This update, adopted on 17 February 2025, provides regulatory recommendations on vaccine design, safety, and immunogenicity assessments in populations with weakened immune systems.


1. Why is this addendum important?

Immunocompromised individuals include patients with:

  • Congenital immune disorders

  • Chronic diseases that suppress immunity

  • Iatrogenic immunosuppression (e.g., chemotherapy, organ transplants)

These individuals are at higher risk of infections, but clinical trials for new vaccines often exclude them, leading to limited data on optimal vaccine dosing and efficacy. This addendum aims to bridge that knowledge gap by establishing guidelines for pre- and post-market vaccine studies in these populations.


2. Key Guidelines for Vaccine Trials in Immunocompromised Individuals

A) When Should These Trials Be Conducted?

  • Before Marketing Authorization: If existing data suggest the vaccine may be suitable for immunocompromised individuals.

  • After Market Approval: When initial trials exclude immunocompromised individuals, leading to uncertainty in dosing and efficacy.

B) Clinical Trial Design Considerations

  1. Vaccine Type Matters

    • Non-live vaccines are generally safe and should be tested in immunocompromised individuals.

    • Live attenuated vaccines should only be tested after sufficient safety data from immunocompetent populations.

  2. Age Considerations

    • A single immunocompromised age group can be tested if a vaccine uses the same dose across all age groups.

    • If the dose varies by age, separate studies for different age groups may be needed.


3. Objectives of Clinical Trials in Immunocompromised Populations

  • Assess vaccine safety in immunocompromised patients.

  • Evaluate immunogenicity (immune response) compared to immunocompetent individuals.

  • Compare different dose regimens to find optimal protection.

Study Design Options:

✅ Compare immunocompromised vs. immunocompetent individuals receiving the same dose.

✅ Test alternative dose regimens in immunocompromised individuals.

✅ Use cross-study comparisons with previously collected immunocompetent data.

4. Selecting the Right Patient Population

Since immunocompromised individuals are not a uniform group, trials should focus on:

  • Organ transplant recipients

  • Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

  • Patients on long-term immunosuppressants (e.g., autoimmune diseases)

  • Patients with inherited immunodeficiencies (e.g., X-linked agammaglobulinemia)

📌 Trials should not mix immunocompromised populations but rather target specific groups for reliable results.

5. Statistical & Safety Considerations

A) Statistical Challenges

  • Limited patient numbers → Trials may not be powered for formal non-inferiority analyses.

  • Descriptive comparisons are often the best feasible approach.

B) Safety Monitoring

  • Separate safety data reporting for immunocompromised subgroups.

  • Monitor for disease flare-ups, transplant rejection risks, and immune response changes.


This EMA addendum ensures that vaccine clinical trials consider immunocompromised individuals, reducing uncertainty in vaccine recommendations for these at-risk populations.

Commentaires


I Sometimes Send Newsletters

Thanks for submitting!

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any guidance of government, health authority, it's purely my understanding. This Blog/Web Site is made available by a regulatory professional, is for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the pharmaceutical regulations, and not to provide specific regulatory advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent pharma regulatory advice and you should discuss from an authenticated regulatory professional in your state.  We have made every reasonable effort to present accurate information on our website; however, we are not responsible for any of the results you experience while visiting our website and request to use official websites.

bottom of page