top of page

USFDA Guidance: Institutional Review Board (IRB) Written Procedures

Writer's picture: Sharan MuruganSharan Murugan

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) play a crucial role in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human research subjects. To enhance transparency, accountability, and compliance, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) have jointly issued final guidance titled Institutional Review Board (IRB) Written Procedures: Guidance for Institutions and IRBs (February 2025).


An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is an independent ethics committee responsible for reviewing, approving, and monitoring clinical research involving human participants. IRBs ensure that research complies with ethical principles and federal regulations, protecting study participants' rights, safety, and welfare.


IRBs operate under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations, including:

  • 21 CFR Part 56 (IRBs for FDA-regulated studies)

  • 45 CFR Part 46 (Common Rule for federally funded research)


This guidance has been prepared jointly by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). OHRP and FDA have been working to harmonize the Agencies' regulatory requirements and guidance for human subject research to enhance human subject protection and reduce regulatory burden. This guidance aims to standardize IRB procedures, streamline regulatory requirements, and ensure harmonization across research institutions.


The purpose of this guidance is to assist staff at institutions and IRBs responsible for preparing and maintaining written procedures. The guidance includes a Written Procedures Checklist (also referred to in this guidance as the Checklist) that incorporates the HHS and FDA regulatory requirements for written procedures for the IRB and recommendations on the type of operational details to include to support each of these requirements.


The IRB Written Procedures Guidance is structured to assist institutions in developing comprehensive protocols. Under 45 CFR 46.103(b)(4) and (5) and 21 CFR 56.108(a) and (b), IRBs must document processes for:

  • Initial and ongoing review of research studies.

  • Ensuring compliance with FDA and HHS regulations.

  • Managing protocol deviations and non-compliance.

  • Reporting adverse events and unanticipated risks to relevant authorities.

A lack of detailed procedures can lead to inconsistencies, regulatory violations, and risks to patient safety. The FDA and OHRP emphasize that IRBs should go beyond merely restating regulations; they must develop operationally feasible written procedures.


The FDA and OHRP have taken a proactive step in harmonizing regulations for IRB governance. Institutions should carefully evaluate their IRB policies, incorporate the Written Procedures Checklist, and ensure ongoing training for IRB members. For a complete reference, download the official guidance from the FDA website:📄 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Written Procedures Guidance


Also, check out this information sheet document about "Institutional Review Boards Frequently Asked Questions" which is a compilation of answers to questions asked by the FDA regarding the protection of human subjects of research

Comments


I Sometimes Send Newsletters

Thanks for submitting!

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any guidance of government, health authority, it's purely my understanding. This Blog/Web Site is made available by a regulatory professional, is for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the pharmaceutical regulations, and not to provide specific regulatory advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent pharma regulatory advice and you should discuss from an authenticated regulatory professional in your state.  We have made every reasonable effort to present accurate information on our website; however, we are not responsible for any of the results you experience while visiting our website and request to use official websites.

bottom of page